Tibetan Buddhism , according to Jose Tirado. Bennett  Teachings and teaching methods[ edit ] Basis of teachings[ edit ] Present here now  We do not remember ourselves  Conscious Labor is an action where the person who is performing the act is present to what he is doing; not absentminded. At the same time he is striving to perform the act more efficiently. Intentional suffering is the act of struggling against automatism such as daydreaming, pleasure, food eating for reasons other than real hunger , etc. Self-Observation Observation of ones own behavior and habits.
|Published (Last):||20 April 2004|
|PDF File Size:||16.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Start your review of The Fourth Way Write a review Aug 02, Scot rated it really liked it This book took me six months to crawl through and though painful at times was worth the effort.
It mirrored in many ways my own journey in terms of timing and though I could not pretend to have initiated the level of effort the Ouspensky says that we need to wake up from our slumber, from time to time I catch glimpses and that reminder alone was worth the read.
I would not recommend this book for anyone that is not naturally drawn toward it and would say if you are interested in the ideas of This book took me six months to crawl through and though painful at times was worth the effort.
I would not recommend this book for anyone that is not naturally drawn toward it and would say if you are interested in the ideas of G. Gurdjieff there are many easier places to start. For me though this was an excellent place to begin because it mirrored the journey and was a reminder that no matter how complex and difficult life and the world can seem at times, patience, reflection, and effort are rewarded.
If you are interested in digging in start with Toward Awakening by Jean Vaysse. There are quite a lot of concepts covered, but the main ones are that we are not conscious, do not self-remember, are mechanical and have 4 centers: moving, instinctive, emotional and intellectual.
The idea in principle is good; that we need to work toward self-development and growth by becoming more aware of the multiple "Is" that we have through the centers and understanding how When I read this book it literally made me angry to know just how flawed the teachings and the way it is taught is.
The idea in principle is good; that we need to work toward self-development and growth by becoming more aware of the multiple "Is" that we have through the centers and understanding how they can be used appropriately to transform ourselves. The problem is that Ouspensky hides behind words and fails to explore his ideas any further than what he wants to focus on. I am aware of myself, my surroundings and can remember it. So what does he mean by it?
Its his own made up definition of these words. So if he has his own definitions then he should firstly call it something else, secondly explain what he means by those definitions and lastly provide evidence for the phenomenon behind the definitions. But when you look at the dialogue between Ouspensky and the other person, they are insistently asking what Ouspensky means by some of his definitions, but he refuses to answer and repeatedly says "figure it out for yourself by practice and you will understand".
The vagueness of his terminology not only becomes a problem for practice, but also for validity. He just tells people to accept his ideas and practice it. This is what irritates me the most. He acts like some authority who has special knowledge over others without actually caring to explain why his knowledge is factually accurate.
He just makes the assumption that people will believe whatever he says and that they should learn how to practice it on their own. Believing in his ideas without actually seeing results is blind faith. The responses to the questions are also quite disturbing. Again, it is him acting like an authority who has special knowledge. He is an elitist and a false prophet, who again, hides behind his words. From what I gather, what he means by lacking consciousness is the fact that we are constantly doing things without knowing the reasons why we do it - which according to the system means that we are mechanical.
To put it in psychological terms that actually make sense this is the distinction between automatic and controlled thinking. I agree that oftentimes we are more in the automatic state and seldom in the controlled state. Automatic thinking serves a purpose. If we were always controlled in our thinking it would be impossible to filter out certain information and would result in information overload.
Self-remembering in the system really means that we often forget why we act in certain ways. Some ways we act contradict each other. We are also unable to remember a total self that is congruent with all sides of ourselves. Again, this is true. For example, I could be trying to relax, which is positive, but when someone interrupts me I get angry, which is negative.
Which brings me to why Ouspensky has no grasp on emotions. He basically says that there are "wrong emotions" and that there are "right emotions" and that the "wrong" ones need to be discarded. The wrong emotions are basically negative emotions: anger, sadness, anxiety etc. But anyone with a basic understanding of the human psyche knows that these emotions serve a useful purpose. When we are anxious it alerts us that our body is in a dangerous situation and that we need to deal with it appropriately.
There is nothing inherently wrong with negative emotions. But Ouspensky actually goes so far to call these emotions unreal.
And by telling other people to abandon their negative emotions, he is effectively telling them to repress theirs too. He said that you need to ignore negative emotions.
Research suggests that repressing emotions actually make it harder for the emotions to go away. First of all, anyone who is in the daunting position of repressing thoughts knows that it is harder to ignore those thoughts than dealing with them. And the more they build up the harder it is to deal with them.
In one chapter he says that the moon controls our behaviour and that we communicate with the moon. This is nothing more than pseudoscience. He says that when we die the moon eats us, because it is hungry. He goes on about how we consume "impressions" in this convoluted explanation that lack any parsimony. It is no surprise to me that Ouspensky abandoned the system long after people already committed to following his outrageous ideas.
But I take it how it is. Even though Ouspensky consistently says that the system is practical and not theoretical, there is really nothing that actually tells you how to self-remember or become conscious, so your guess is as good as mine how to actually practice this.
Until then, I find the system and his teaching style discouraging and is not worth my time.
In London, a number of eminent people became interested in his work. The influential intellectual and editor A. Prominent theosophist and editor G. Mead became interested in his ideas on the fourth dimension. By order of the British government, Gurdjieff was not allowed to settle in London. But after his death, Mme Ouspensky showed its draft to Gurdjieff who praised its accuracy and permitted its publication.
P. D. Ouspensky
Shamuro Unfortunately, I am very disappointed with this book. Classic Ouspensky, also try and read Gurdjieff if you can, it will blow your mind! But Ouspensky actually goes so far to call these emotions unreal. We think we have to do with real beings, but in reality we have to do with imaginary beings.
The Fourth Way